New dilemma: KM is to put company or employee's benefit first?
Continue the previouo discussion, Whost benefit should be put first in KM , the company's or the employee's?
In an ideal status, it's should be employee, because employee are the most valuable asset of company. Once the employee get benefit from company, the company will benefit from employee, in this way, we can max. the benefit. Vice vesa, even company can get benefit from KM but it won't be a long term one since employee's lost will transfer to company sooner or later.
But on the other hand, how can a company be confident enought that the benefited employee can only benefit the company itself but not the competitor?
2 Comments:
I think it is just fair to think that the most important objective of a firm is profit. If profit isn't there, then neither will the firm!
-- awie
top [url=http://www.c-online-casino.co.uk/]free casino[/url] hinder the latest [url=http://www.realcazinoz.com/]realcazinoz.com[/url] unshackled no store reward at the chief [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]free casino games
[/url].
Post a Comment
<< Home